Mineral Oxychloride vs. Conventional Oxidants
How Jenfitch mineral oxychloride (JC 9465 / JC 9450) compares to chlorine, ozone, and chlorine dioxide — oxidation potential, residual, handling, and cost, side by side.
Approved, certified & independently validated
EPA FIFRARegistered
USDA OrganicCertified
NSF/ANSIStandard 60
Choosing an Oxidant
One chemistry, measured against the field.
Chlorine, ozone, and chlorine dioxide are the established oxidants of the water-treatment world, and each has a place. But if you are evaluating mineral oxychloride chemistry, the questions come down to oxidation strength, whether a residual is left behind, how the product is handled, and what it costs to run.
Jenfitch mineral oxychloride sits at 2.8–2.9 V — second only to fluorine and above every conventional oxidant on this page — while shipping as a ready-to-use liquid dosed by ORP. The three comparisons below break down the trade-offs honestly.
Head-to-Head
Three comparisons.
vs. Chlorine
Far higher oxidation potential (2.8–2.9 V vs 1.36 V), no chlorinated by-products, and 12–24× the effectiveness against biofilm, bacteria, viruses, and spores.
See comparison
vs. Ozone
Ozone-class oxidation as a stable pourable liquid — no gas-generation train, plus a measurable ORP residual, at less than 1% of a conventional ozone system's cost.
See comparison
vs. Chlorine Dioxide
Higher oxidation potential (2.8–2.9 V vs 1.57 V), no on-site gas generation, ORP-controlled dosing, and a mild mineral-oxide residual.
See comparisonThe Benchmark
Oxidation potential of common oxidants.
| Oxidant | Oxidation potential (V) |
|---|---|
| Fluorine | 3.06 |
| Mineral oxychloride (JC 9465 / JC 9450) | 2.8–2.9 |
| Hydroxyl radical (•OH) | 2.80 |
| Ozone (O3) | 2.07 |
| Chlorine dioxide (ClO2) | 1.57 |
| Hypochlorous acid (HOCl) | 1.49 |
| Chlorine (Cl2) | 1.36 |
| Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) | 0.94 |
| Superoxide (O2−) | −2.40 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Comparing oxidants.
Which oxidant is strongest?
By standard oxidation potential, fluorine leads at 3.06 V, followed by mineral oxychloride at 2.8–2.9 V — on par with the hydroxyl radical (2.80 V) and above ozone (2.07 V), chlorine dioxide (1.57 V), and chlorine (1.36 V). Fluorine is not used as a water disinfectant, which makes mineral oxychloride the strongest practical oxidant on this list.
Is a residual left behind?
Ozone dissipates and leaves no residual. Mineral oxychloride leaves mildly biocidal mineral-oxide by-products that resist recontamination, and dosing is verified by a measurable ORP. Chlorine and chlorine dioxide also carry a residual, though of a different chemical character.
How do the costs compare?
For equivalent oxidation, mineral oxychloride runs at less than 1% of the cost of a conventional ozone system — largely by avoiding the capital and energy of generating and dissolving a gas. Against chlorine, lower dose requirements (inorganics below 1 mg/L per mg/L versus roughly 6 mg/L for chlorine) help offset a higher unit price.
Are chlorine, ozone, and ClO₂ still valid choices?
Yes. All three are established, well-understood technologies with decades of regulatory history. Chlorine remains the default residual disinfectant for distribution systems; ozone is widely used for taste, odor, and advanced oxidation; chlorine dioxide is valued for selective oxidation and biofilm penetration. Mineral oxychloride is a complementary or alternative option where their trade-offs become limiting.
How is mineral oxychloride dosed?
It is a 100% water-soluble, ready-to-use liquid dosed to a target oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) in millivolts. Roughly +600 mV establishes a disinfection barrier and +700 mV delivers a 6-log kill in under 10 seconds.